<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does RSS = R$$? Feeding Publisher Profitability/Pheedo Shmeedo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circ.us/2006/09/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circ.us/2006/09/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/</link>
	<description>Circ.us is a creative communications firm that helps brands tell stories through innovation and participation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:21:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pheedo</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2006/09/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>Pheedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2006/09/25/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The R$$ of RSS Panel at OMMA...&lt;/strong&gt;

 It was just one short year ago that I remember sitting in the audience for the RSS panel at OMMA (there were about 30 or so of my peers looking on with me) thinking &#8220;what will this space be......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The R$$ of RSS Panel at OMMA&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> It was just one short year ago that I remember sitting in the audience for the RSS panel at OMMA (there were about 30 or so of my peers looking on with me) thinking &#8220;what will this space be&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana VanDen Heuvel</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2006/09/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana VanDen Heuvel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2006/09/25/does-rss-r-feeding-publisher-profitabilitypheedo-shmeedo/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>Adam,

Thanks for attending the session!  I&#039;m pleased to see some postings about it on the web, and it&#039;s good to have a raging cynic in the audience to counter the bullish optimism at the front of the room.

You mentioned that what we shared was old data.  I agree, however, your post didn&#039;t point me to any &quot;new data&quot; beyond what we have.  Please post on where that data is and I promise to incorporate into the next panel.

You&#039;re right on with your comment &quot;It seems that all the people on this board are looking at different ways to monetize RSS.&quot;  That&#039;s why we put a diverse panel together. Glad to see we met our objective there.  However, I don&#039;t see the same data illustrating that substantiates &quot;advertisers are not using the technology the are advertising in&quot;, and I don&#039;t recall anyone on the panel mentioning such a disconnect.  My experience is exactly the contrary.  Advertisers are the ones that are sometimes hardest to win over, and they&#039;ve not going to spend their money across an increasingly fragemented media spectrum if they don&#039;t understand what they&#039;re buying.  I also don&#039;t forsee a period of RSS SPAM.  Sure, with SPLOGS and the like, there&#039;s some of that, but not from the advertiser perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Adam,</p>
<p>Thanks for attending the session!  I&#8217;m pleased to see some postings about it on the web, and it&#8217;s good to have a raging cynic in the audience to counter the bullish optimism at the front of the room.</p>
<p>You mentioned that what we shared was old data.  I agree, however, your post didn&#8217;t point me to any &#8220;new data&#8221; beyond what we have.  Please post on where that data is and I promise to incorporate into the next panel.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right on with your comment &#8220;It seems that all the people on this board are looking at different ways to monetize RSS.&#8221;  That&#8217;s why we put a diverse panel together. Glad to see we met our objective there.  However, I don&#8217;t see the same data illustrating that substantiates &#8220;advertisers are not using the technology the are advertising in&#8221;, and I don&#8217;t recall anyone on the panel mentioning such a disconnect.  My experience is exactly the contrary.  Advertisers are the ones that are sometimes hardest to win over, and they&#8217;ve not going to spend their money across an increasingly fragemented media spectrum if they don&#8217;t understand what they&#8217;re buying.  I also don&#8217;t forsee a period of RSS SPAM.  Sure, with SPLOGS and the like, there&#8217;s some of that, but not from the advertiser perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

