<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Networking 2.M</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/</link>
	<description>Circ.us is a creative communications firm that helps brands tell stories through innovation and participation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:21:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Future Of Content &#124; A Media Circus</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>The Future Of Content &#124; A Media Circus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2007/03/27/social-networking-2m/#comment-563</guid>
		<description>[...] A recent post over at TechCrunch touches on similar questions, and I agree with much of what Arrington has to say. As always, I agree with his strong belief in mobile as the center of our social network. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A recent post over at TechCrunch touches on similar questions, and I agree with much of what Arrington has to say. As always, I agree with his strong belief in mobile as the center of our social network. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking 2.M (part three…and yes, this means mobile) &#124; A Media Circus</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/comment-page-1/#comment-562</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking 2.M (part three…and yes, this means mobile) &#124; A Media Circus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2007/03/27/social-networking-2m/#comment-562</guid>
		<description>[...] I have certainly spoken about this before (and here a few months later), but with all the hullabaloo surrounding both the mobile industry and the social networking space, I feel it is crucial to return to the theme of mobile social networks and the personal nature of the handset. In a recent press release, an executive from Nokia had this to; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have certainly spoken about this before (and here a few months later), but with all the hullabaloo surrounding both the mobile industry and the social networking space, I feel it is crucial to return to the theme of mobile social networks and the personal nature of the handset. In a recent press release, an executive from Nokia had this to; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: We Just Can’t Get Enough Mobile This Summer at A MediaCirc.Us &#124; A Media Circus</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>We Just Can’t Get Enough Mobile This Summer at A MediaCirc.Us &#124; A Media Circus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 12:05:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2007/03/27/social-networking-2m/#comment-560</guid>
		<description>[...] As I have alluded to in my Social Networking 2.M posts (here is part 2 of Social Networking 2.M) and discussion on mobile email, the promise of mobile for brands is in marketing, not advertising. We had a great conversation at AMediacirc.us in early July about mobile marketing versus mobile advertising and we got to hear from Dan Meehan and Richard Hurring amongst others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As I have alluded to in my Social Networking 2.M posts (here is part 2 of Social Networking 2.M) and discussion on mobile email, the promise of mobile for brands is in marketing, not advertising. We had a great conversation at AMediacirc.us in early July about mobile marketing versus mobile advertising and we got to hear from Dan Meehan and Richard Hurring amongst others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Social Networking 2.M (part 2) at A Media Circus : Emerging Media Strategies</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2007/03/social-networking-2m/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Networking 2.M (part 2) at A Media Circus : Emerging Media Strategies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 12:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2007/03/27/social-networking-2m/#comment-561</guid>
		<description>[...] Back in March I spoke about what I thought was one of the inherent value propositions of the mobile space (other than talking and navigation). I think a lot of mobile marketing companies are either fooling themselves, confused or way to far ahead of the game when they think that mobile video and banner advertising is anywhere near the potential of reaching critical mass, making it a scalable advertising channel. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Back in March I spoke about what I thought was one of the inherent value propositions of the mobile space (other than talking and navigation). I think a lot of mobile marketing companies are either fooling themselves, confused or way to far ahead of the game when they think that mobile video and banner advertising is anywhere near the potential of reaching critical mass, making it a scalable advertising channel. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

