<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shopping Online Finally Gets More Social</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circ.us/2007/05/shopping-online-finally-gets-more-social/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circ.us/2007/05/shopping-online-finally-gets-more-social/</link>
	<description>Circ.us is a creative communications firm that helps brands tell stories through innovation and participation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:21:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Boys vs. Girls&#8211;The Battle For Social Media &#124; A Media Circus</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2007/05/shopping-online-finally-gets-more-social/comment-page-1/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>Boys vs. Girls&#8211;The Battle For Social Media &#124; A Media Circus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Aug 2007 11:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/2007/05/24/shopping-online-finally-gets-more-social/#comment-646</guid>
		<description>[...] It may not be PC for me to say that social networks focused on fashion are mainly for females, however if you look at the demo info for sites such as StyleHive and ThisNext, you would probably see that this statement is fairly accurate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] It may not be PC for me to say that social networks focused on fashion are mainly for females, however if you look at the demo info for sites such as StyleHive and ThisNext, you would probably see that this statement is fairly accurate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

