<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Is Responsbile For Monitoring Contextual Advertising?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circ.us/2008/07/who-is-responsbile-for-monitoring-contextual-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circ.us/2008/07/who-is-responsbile-for-monitoring-contextual-advertising/</link>
	<description>Circ.us is a creative communications firm that helps brands tell stories through innovation and participation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:21:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Philip Cockrell</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2008/07/who-is-responsbile-for-monitoring-contextual-advertising/comment-page-1/#comment-2588</link>
		<dc:creator>Philip Cockrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/?p=683#comment-2588</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or has there been a massive increase in posts on this topic lately? There is a lot of truth in the fact that there is likely more harm that good to be done by appearing where you are not wanted on the internet, it&#039;s almost like vilifying an advertiser because they would  choose to be so tasteless... I don&#039;t think the old &quot;any exposure is good exposure&quot; idiom really applies in the online advertising sphere - you need to get it right to be of any benefit to the user, otherwise they will switch off the next time they see that ad too. I wrote a similar themed post here : http://blog.firstlightera.com/blog/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.aspx

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or has there been a massive increase in posts on this topic lately? There is a lot of truth in the fact that there is likely more harm that good to be done by appearing where you are not wanted on the internet, it&#8217;s almost like vilifying an advertiser because they would  choose to be so tasteless&#8230; I don&#8217;t think the old &#8220;any exposure is good exposure&#8221; idiom really applies in the online advertising sphere &#8211; you need to get it right to be of any benefit to the user, otherwise they will switch off the next time they see that ad too. I wrote a similar themed post here : <a href="http://blog.firstlightera.com/blog/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://blog.firstlightera.com/blog/post/Editorial-vs-Keywords.aspx</a></p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
