<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: We Agree, Brands Should Join the Conversation, but Do They Always Have To Be Nice?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/</link>
	<description>Circ.us is a creative communications firm that helps brands tell stories through innovation and participation.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 08:21:44 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2704</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 18:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/?p=859#comment-2704</guid>
		<description>Great point Caitlin! I could not agree more</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great point Caitlin! I could not agree more</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caitlin</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Caitlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:16:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/?p=859#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely a double edged sword for brands.  Consumers demnd that they become &quot;more transparent&quot; and &quot;join the conversation&quot; but they still aren&#039;t allowed to be real people?
Just the fact that people are talking about this Facebook group is press for the airline, which is good.  Some people will think this is funny and some won&#039;t but brands need to be willing to put themselves out there.  A couple of failed social media attempts is much more progressive than not trying at all in my book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely a double edged sword for brands.  Consumers demnd that they become &#8220;more transparent&#8221; and &#8220;join the conversation&#8221; but they still aren&#8217;t allowed to be real people?<br />
Just the fact that people are talking about this Facebook group is press for the airline, which is good.  Some people will think this is funny and some won&#8217;t but brands need to be willing to put themselves out there.  A couple of failed social media attempts is much more progressive than not trying at all in my book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:28:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/?p=859#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>wow, this is the first time I ever got Bob Dylan as a comment--thanks Greg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow, this is the first time I ever got Bob Dylan as a comment&#8211;thanks Greg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg March</title>
		<link>http://circ.us/2008/11/we-agree-brands-should-join-the-conversation-but-do-they-always-have-to-be-nice/comment-page-1/#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg March</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://amediacirc.us/?p=859#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>consumers can shit on brands and brands can NOT shit on consumers (not if it wants to endear itself them, hence provide margin for its patrons).  This obstruction of the 1st amendment is price the brands pay for money they provide to stock holders, employees, bosses, ad agencies, charities, governments, etc...

Good trade.  Like Bob Dylan says, You Gotta Serve Somebody http://blip.fm/profile/gmarch/blip/1085972</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>consumers can shit on brands and brands can NOT shit on consumers (not if it wants to endear itself them, hence provide margin for its patrons).  This obstruction of the 1st amendment is price the brands pay for money they provide to stock holders, employees, bosses, ad agencies, charities, governments, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Good trade.  Like Bob Dylan says, You Gotta Serve Somebody <a href="http://blip.fm/profile/gmarch/blip/1085972" rel="nofollow">http://blip.fm/profile/gmarch/blip/1085972</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

